Time magazine seeks bitcoin and crypto-friendly finance chief

Time magazine seeks bitcoin and crypto-friendly finance chief

„The media industry is in a rapid state of evolution,“ the job posting reads.

In a job posting, Time Magazines is seeking a chief financial officer who is familiar with blockchain and cryptocurrencies.

According to the ad on LinkedIn, Time is looking for a chief financial officer with more than seven years‘ experience in senior roles and who is „knowledgeable 1K Daily Profit about bitcoin and cryptocurrencies“. The candidate will work at the magazine’s offices in New York City.

„The media industry is in a rapid state of evolution,“ the job posting reads. „TIME is looking for a chief financial officer who can help the company transform.“

The chief financial officer’s responsibilities will include examining economic trends and complying with local and global financial requirements. The candidate is expected to replace outgoing chief financial officer Christopher Gaydos, who has been with the magazine since 2018.

Time magazine is not the only employer using the popularity of the crypto space to attract new professionals

Amsterdam-based education technology company Growth Tribe has converted job postings for a digital designer and user interface instructor into a non-fungible token and listed them on the Rarible marketplace. Candidates can still bid on the token, but applications will only be accepted through the company’s website.

„Posting a job as an NFT from a ‚collectible‘ perspective doesn’t make sense at this point, but it makes perfect sense when it comes to attracting the attention of digital professionals,“ said David Arnoux, Growth Tribe’s chief strategist.

The magazine has also been more receptive to blockchain recently. Time announced on Monday it would auction three non-fungible digital artwork tokens inspired by its most iconic covers. Time creative director D. W. Pine, who designed one of the covers, described NFTs as a „crazy“ but „lucrative“ world.

As oscilações massivas do Bitcoin dão pausa ao investimento de reserva dos CFOs Mulling: Bloomberg

A correção de 30% do preço do Bitcoin foi suficiente para dar uma segunda opinião a alguns CFOs.

A Bitcoin recuperou algumas dessas perdas

Os diretores financeiros de Wall Street (CFO) estão mais cautelosos em colocar fundos da empresa em bitcoin depois da queda de 30% no preço da semana passada, relata a Bloomberg.

Empresas de capital aberto como a MicroStrategy e a Square Inc. investiram milhões de dólares de reservas de caixa da empresa em bitcoin (BTC, +3,28%) durante 2020. Outras empresas seguiram o exemplo, incluindo as gigantes de seguros Ruffers e MassMutual.

Mas dado o retorno da infame volatilidade dos preços do bitcoin – que viu o preço da maior moeda criptográfica cair milhares abaixo de seu pico de 41.900 dólares estabelecido em janeiro – a atração dessa estratégia pode ter diminuído, de acordo com os executivos da empresa com quem a Bloomberg falou. Desde então, a Bitcoin recuperou algumas dessas perdas e agora está negociando em mãos a $35.700, de acordo com a CoinDesk 20.

As flutuações severas diminuem a atratividade

As flutuações severas diminuem a atratividade da principal moeda criptográfica porque as reservas de caixa da empresa são principalmente fundos de dias chuvosos para manter as principais necessidades de negócios durante turnos de queda inesperada.

„Seria uma bandeira vermelha para os investidores se uma empresa comprasse ativos financeiros para fins especulativos não relacionados ao seu negócio principal“, disse Michael O’Rourke, estrategista-chefe de mercado da JonesTrading.

O professor adjunto da Columbia Business School, Robert Willens, disse à Bloomberg que investir em bitcoin com esses fundos representa um risco que os CFOs podem não estar dispostos a suportar depois da ação de preços da semana passada.

„É uma estratégia inteligente? Poderia ser. Mas, é claro, se não for, se tornaria algo que poderia ameaçar a própria existência de uma corporação“, disse Willens.

Hvorfor fortsætter DeFi’s „Flash Loan“ -udbydere med at returnere nogle af deres fortjeneste?

I de seneste måneder har Harvest, Akropolis, Value DeFi, Cheese Bank, Eminence og Origin Protocol alle lidt under flashlån. Ud af de seneste seks udnyttelser er tre af disse hacking-hændelser afsluttet med en delvis tilbagevenden af ​​udnyttede midler, hvilket er blevet en ny tendens inden for DeFi-cirklen.

Selvom årsagerne til, at disse DeFi-angribere returnerer deres dårligt opnåede midler stadig er uklare, kan en mulig årsag være moral.

For at forstå hvorfor skal vi starte med, hvad et flash-lån faktisk er.

Hvad er et flash-lån?

Et flash-lån involverer en hacker, der modtager et lån fra en Bitcoin Code, bruger den lånte kapital og returnerer det hele inden for den samme smarte kontrakttransaktion. Da hele lånet sker i en smart kontrakttransaktion, kræver det ikke sikkerhed.

I det væsentlige kunne enhver få et flash-lån uden sikkerhed ved blot at dække de involverede gebyrer. Analytikere hos on-chain analysefirmaet Glassnode forklarer:

”Dette betyder, at brugere af flash-lån, herunder angribere, påtager sig meget lille risiko; hvis transaktionen ikke går i stykker, og lånet ikke kan betales tilbage, vender det hele tilbage, hvilket betyder, at brugeren ikke mister mere end gasomkostningerne. Derimod er det potentielle afkast betydeligt. ”

Hvis angriberen kan foretage en arbitrage med den lånte kapital i løbet af den korte periode, kan angriberen derefter returnere den lånte kapital og være tilbage med overskuddet.

Men disse overskud skal komme et eller andet sted, og mens hver udnyttelse er forskellig (og kompliceret), er det korte svar, at de ofte kommer fra andre brugere – de „tabere“ i de handler, som angriberen vinder, der genererer deres overskud.

Så hvorfor returnerer angribere deres gevinster?

Stemning om flashlånudnyttelse i DeFi-rummet forbliver blandet. På den ene side kan de betragtes som et angreb eller en udnyttelse, fordi de fører til, at brugerne mister deres midler. Men nogle hævder, at flashlån ikke er ulovlige og følger reglerne og systemerne på de platforme, de sker på.

Det kan være, at nogle af disse angribere falder ind i den tidligere lejr og returnerer midler, så de ikke skader uskyldige brugere.

Som eksempel led Value DeFi den 15. november et flash-låneangreb, som resulterede i et tab på 6 millioner dollars. Angriberen lånte 80.000 Ethereum til en værdi af knap 40 millioner dollars fra DeFi-protokollen Aave. Derefter voldtog angriberen to stablecoins DAI og USDC, nettede et overskud på bekostning af Value DeFi-brugere og returnerede derefter $ 40 millioner basiskapital til Aave.

Su Zhu, administrerende direktør for Three Arrows Capital, sagde, at hackeren også returnerede $ 2 millioner af det fortjeneste, der blev optjent i udnyttelsen. Han bemærkede, at den samme udnyttelse ville være mulig uden flash-lån, men kun hvaler eller investorer med stor nettoværdi ville være i stand til at udføre det.

Ifølge Su efterlod udbyderen en besked, der spurgte „Kender du virkelig flashlån [sic]?“ og returnerede $ 2 millioner for at vise god vilje. Handlingen tjener som en påmindelse, siger Su, at uden „flash-lån“ ville den samme „udnyttelse“ teknisk være mulig – men kun tilgængelig for superrige hvaler.

En udbyder returnerede også $ 50.000 til et offer, der mistede $ 100.000 fra angrebet, efter at de fortalte angriberen, at de er sygeplejerske.

Es probable que el robo de Bitcoin aumente en la exigua economía posterior a COVID: informe

Sin embargo, los ciberdelincuentes pueden favorecer una criptomoneda diferente en los próximos meses.

Es probable que el fraude y el robo relacionados con las criptomonedas aumenten en el mundo posterior a COVID-19, según un nuevo informe del proveedor de antivirus y ciberseguridad Kaspersky Lab

Securelist, el brazo de investigación de ciberamenazas de Kaspersky, publicó un informe sobre ciberamenazas a las organizaciones financieras, pronosticando algunos tipos específicos de ataques financieros que probablemente aumentarán en 2021.

Securelist ha predicho que una ola de pobreza alimentada por la pandemia de COVID-19 conducirá inevitablemente a que „más personas recurran al delito, incluido el ciberdelito“. Eso también podría significar un aumento de los delitos relacionados con Bitcoin ( BTC ).

Según el brazo de investigación de Kaspersky, es probable que Bitcoin sea el activo más atractivo para el ciberdelito porque es el activo digital más popular. El informe dice:

“Podríamos ver ciertas economías colapsando y las monedas locales desplomándose, lo que haría que el robo de Bitcoin sea mucho más atractivo. Deberíamos esperar más fraude, dirigido principalmente a BTC, debido a que esta criptomoneda es la más popular „.

Los investigadores de Securelist también sugirieron que los perpetradores en línea podrían cambiar a activos digitales más centrados en la privacidad como Monero ( XMR ). Según la compañía, este cambio ocurriría debido a las crecientes „capacidades técnicas de monitoreo, desanonimización y confiscación de BTC“. El informe de Securelist dice:

“Deberíamos esperar que los ciberdelincuentes se cambien a las criptomonedas de tránsito para cobrar a las víctimas. Hay una razón para creer que podrían cambiar a otras monedas con privacidad mejorada, como Monero, para usarlas primero como moneda de transición y luego convertir los fondos a cualquier otra criptomoneda de su elección, incluido BTC „.

Como informó anteriormente Cointelegraph, los delitos relacionados con la criptografía se desaceleraron significativamente en 2020, aunque algunos sectores de la criptografía, como las finanzas descentralizadas, se han convertido en nuevos focos de actividad delictiva. Según un informe de la empresa de redes privadas virtuales Atlas VPN, es probable que los ataques relacionados con las cadenas de bloques y las criptomonedas sigan disminuyendo en 2021.

No, Ethereum 2.0 will not be released on December 1

Ethereum (ETH) fans are celebrating the setting of the genesis block 2.0 date, scheduled for December 1st. At first glance, it seems like a great achievement, but not quite the story.

The journey began in late 2018, when a new roadmap was released to start a network with validators, in the Proof of Stake system, in addition to the additional layers (shards), significantly increasing the computational capacity.

However, there are no plans for the new network to enable the launch of decentralised applications and smart contracts. In fact, at this first moment it is not possible to carry out any movements within the 2.0 network.

How is the demand in DeFi?

Decentralized finance (DeFi) peaked between August and September with the launch of several tokens. The main segments were collateralized loans, decentralized exchanges, and liquidity pools.

The magic of high profitability was in the value of these tokens, which were distributed to participants and investors in these projects. While Uniswap (UNI), UMA, Compound (COMP) and Yearn Finance (YFI) were all valued, everything was a wonder.

Uni / Theter
Uni / Theter

When the tide turned at the end of October, investors began to understand that most of the gains were based on the token appreciation. It was then that the universe of DeFi came to know the term „impermanent loss,“ or loss caused by imbalance.

Although traditional market analysts had pointed to this risk long before, the DeFi boom left investors blind. This led to congestion in the Ethereum network, raising the average rate per transaction to a peak of $8.

The disappointment was so great that in October the number of transactions in the Bitcoin Profit network plummeted by 60%. As a result, the fees have dropped to the current $0.60.

Above is the graph of the value traded on the Ethereum network in dollars, according to CoinMetrics. Most of this drop can be attributed to the lower volume in decentralized exchanges, even with the stagnation of the amount invested in DeFi.

Is DeFi dead? What is the impact for ETH?

No, the universe of decentralized finance is not dead. There was only an adjustment after the bubble formed by the strong appreciation of the tokens. However, it must be understood that the number of active wallets in the Uniswap leader, for example, hardly exceeds 40,000.

Endereços ativos na Uniswap. Fonte: DappRadar
Active addresses at Uniswap. Source: DappRadarThe main conclusion is that DeFi is only at the beginning, and Ethereum dominates over 80% of this volume. However, there is no logic in betting on valuation due to the launch of ETH 2.0, which effectively has no date to become functional.

IOTA becomes an industry partner of the TU Vienna research group

A new research project at the Vienna University of Technology has dedicated itself entirely to the topics of interoperability, blockchain and IoT. The IOTA Foundation is involved in the long-term project – and does not just want to advance its own network.

The IOTA Foundation has joined the newly founded DLT research group at the Vienna University of Technology (TU Vienna) as an industrial partner

The group is part of the Christian Doppler Laboratory Blockchain Technologies for the Internet of Things (CDL BOT) and researches the interface between the Internet of Things (IoT) and distributed ledgers-Technologies (DLT) such as blockchain or the Tangle from IOTA. As the latest addition to the Christian Doppler Research Association, the project is financed by state subsidies. Margarete Schönbock, Federal Minister for Digitization and Business Location, also made the opening on November 26th.

IOTA co-founder Dominik Schiener is pleased in a corresponding blog entry the IOTA Foundation on the cooperation:

We are honored to be part of this long-term research project and thank the Christian Doppler Gesellschaft and the Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs for recognizing and supporting the enormous potential of blockchain and distributed ledger technology for building a more transparent, trustworthy and networked one Economy.

However, IOTA is not the only representative from the blockchain industry to have joined the venture. The Austrian Bitcoin exchange Bitpanda is also involved in the project: with its research arm Pantos.

In order to take the industry to the next level, the interoperability of blockchains and the integrity of data should be the top priority. We believe that our partnership with the Christian Doppler Gesellschaft, the Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs and the IOTA Foundation allows us to stay at the forefront of interoperability development, one of the greatest complexities in this young but steadily maturing industry to solve,

Bitpanda CEO and co-founder Eric Demuth is quoted in the press release.

IOTA + X: focus on intercompatibility

The economist and programmer Prof. Dr.-Ing. Stefan Schulte. Schulte also emphasizes in his statement the importance of interoperability for the future prosperity of decentralized networks and the Internet of Things:

With the increasing number of potential applications for DLT-based payments and data exchange in the Internet of Things, new DLTs need to be integrated and interoperability between different DLTs becomes necessary. I look forward to […] finding new solutions for this highly topical issue together.

BitMEX och grundare står inför ännu en rättegång

BitMEX och grundare står inför ännu en rättegång som påstår penningtvätt och marknadsmanipulation

  • BitMEX och dess grundare har drabbats av ännu en stämningsansökan som påstod förskingring, penningtvätt och marknadsmanipulation.
  • Păun Gabriel-Razvan, bosatt i Bucuresti, Rumänien, anklagar BitMEXs interna handelsdisk för direkt deltagande i manipulationssystem.

Belägrade kryptaderivat utbyter BitMEX och dess grundare står inför ännu en rättegång som påstår racketeering, penningtvätt och marknadsmanipulation.

Păun Gabriel-Razvan, bosatt i Bucuresti, Rumänien, väckte talan vid Northern District Court i Kalifornien på fredag. Han hävdar att HDR Global Trading Limited, operatören av BitMEX, börsens grundare Arthur Hayes, Ben Delo, och Samuel Reed och andra, engagerade Bitcoin Trader sig i och underlättade racketverksamhet, „tjänar svaranden miljarder dollar i olagliga vinster.“

Klagomålet kommer en månad efter att en liknande rättegång inlämnades mot BitMEX och grundare av käranden Dmitry Dolgov, bosatt i Moskva, Ryssland. Både Dolgov och Gabriel-Razvan representeras av samma advokat – Pavel Pogodin från Consensus Law.

„Pavel Pogodin från“ Consensus Law „fortsätter att lämna falska anspråk mot oss och andra inom kryptovalutasektorn“, sa en BitMEX-talesman idag till The Block. „Som vi har sagt tidigare, fungerar tyvärr herr Pogodin precis som ett patenttroll, och lämnar in“ kopiera och klistra in „klagomål mot oss baserat på återhasad information som tas bort från internet. Vi kommer att hantera detta genom den normala processprocessen och förbli helt övertygad om att domstolarna kommer att se hans anspråk på vad de är. „

Den nya 197-sidors stämningen hävdar att de tilltalade kringgick känner till dina kunders (KYC) eller anti-penningtvätt (AML) krav och accepterade „obegränsade medel från någon, utan en enda fråga.“ På grund av denna brist på tillsyn strömmade „hackare, skatteflyktare, penningtvättare, smugglare, narkotikahandlare till BitMEX plattformen med heta pengar“, hävdar rättegången.

Gabriel-Razvans stämning hävdar också att „BitMEX deltar direkt i och drar nytta av marknadsmanipulation och penningtvätt genom sin interna handelsdisk och indirekt,“ och beskriver ett specifikt exempel på hur detta sker:

„En penningtvättare (svarande) skulle öppna två växlingskonton – ett hjälpkonto på ett eller flera börser som BitMEX använde för att beräkna indexpriset (Coinbase Pro, Kraken och BitStamp) och ett vinnarkonto på BitMEX,“ förklarar rättegången. „Penningtvättaren skulle då gå in i en stor hävstångsderivatposition på BitMEX och omedelbart utföra marknadsorder från hjälpkontot med maximal glidning för att flytta indexpriset i en gynnsam riktning.“

Gabriel-Razvan hävdar att han lidit „betydande skador“ i ett belopp som ska bevisas vid rättegången. „Käranden drabbades av förlust av egendom … Käranden begär tre gånger det faktiska skadeståndet, kostnadskostnaderna och rimliga advokatsalar.“

Med specifika detaljer berättade Pogodin för The Block att Gabriel-Razvan var „bedragen av 247,94 bitcoin“, vilket är cirka 4,2 miljoner dollar i dagens takt. „Enligt tillämplig lag försöker vi återkräva tre gånger detta belopp (12,6 miljoner dollar) plus ränta, kostnader och advokatavgifter.

Dessutom söker vi straffskador på 50 miljoner dollar enligt Kaliforniens lag

Han fortsatte med att säga att fler „bedragna offer“ för BitMEX kommer fram, och „fler rättegångar förbereds och kommer att inlämnas inom kort.“ Pogodin har tidigare lämnat in liknande klagomål mot kryptoföretagen Ripple och FTX.

Under tiden drabbades BitMEX och grundarna nyligen av tvillingstämningar från den amerikanska regeringen. Justitiedepartementet och Commodities Futures Trading Commission anklagade dem för att ha drivit en oregistrerad handelsplattform, brott mot KYC- och AML-reglerna samt lagen om banksekretess.

VMware: Enterprise blockchain officially launched

Blockchain technologies have long been attractive for established companies too, after which they are used as an enterprise variant.

With its enterprise solution, VMware takes special expectations into account

For years, many companies were rather skeptical of the topic of enterprise blockchain . Recently, however, these blockages have dissolved more and more, which is due to the fact that many providers dispel concerns about the security of the infrastructure and have been able to convince companies of the many advantages of the decentralized ecosystem. In a press release The cloud computing and blockchain provider VMware informs about its new offer of such an enterprise platform.

The commercial availability of the VMware Blockchain offers companies a digital basis for building business networks and providing elementary applications on a decentralized basis. The VMware Blockchain is also a scalable enterprise-class platform that makes data available for a secure, private and immediate workflow.

VMware has worked for several years to make this blockchain platform commercially available. Before that, it was already used in some special and extensive projects. One of them was the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) ’s CHESS settlement solution. Originally, the operators relied on the blockchain from Digital Asset. But now one falls back on the ledger from VMware, using the smart contract protocol DAML from Digital Asset.

We have focused on building an enterprise-class blockchain platform that meets the most stringent application requirements of the financial services industry […] that require reliable, high-performance blockchain services.

VMware has to hold its own against strong competition

Even if solutions in the field of enterprise blockchain are still new territory for many interested parties, the listed company VMware is already facing some competition with its offer. First and foremost, there is certainly the Hyperledger Fabric project . Its biggest sponsor, IBM, is certainly not what one calls a small IT dumpster. Ethereum and Corda’s R3 consortium are also shaking up the market. The question of how VMware would like to gain a foothold seems entirely justified. The company emphasizes that it will serve the very important and fundamental expectations of its clientele. Expandability, security, data protection, performance and scalability are definitely in focus.

The software is easy to implement, manage and update and also offers first-class support. The latter point is noteworthy. Product support is an extremely important point for the company’s blockchain. However, neither IBM nor R3 are beginners in this area.

Pourquoi vous ne devez pas vous fier aux prévisions des experts sur Bitcoin

Prévision du prix des bitcoinsOpinions d’expertsFuturistes

Des critiques comme Warren Buffett et Jamie Dimon aux fans comme Peter Thiel et Richard Branson, de nombreuses personnalités ont rendu publiques leurs prédictions sur Bitcoin. Bien qu’il soit trop tôt pour savoir qui aura raison, l’histoire montre que les prédictions des experts sur les nouvelles innovations technologiques sont souvent loin d’être exactes.

Deux des investisseurs les plus célèbres et les plus admirés au monde, Warren Buffett et Charlie Munger de Berkshire Hathaway, ont été particulièrement cinglants à l’égard de Bitcoin. En 2018, M. Buffett a décrit Bitcoin comme de la „mort-aux-rats au carré“, tandis que son partenaire commercial Charlie Munger est allé encore plus loin, comparant notoirement Bitcoin au commerce de „cerveaux de bébés fraîchement récoltés“. En 2014, il y a un siècle en années de cryptologie, Jamie Dimon, le PDG de JP Morgan a déclaré : „La question n’est pas de savoir si la banque accepte les bitcoins, la question est de savoir si nous participons même avec les personnes qui facilitent les bitcoins“.

Pourraient-ils avoir raison ? Il se pourrait bien qu’ils aient raison. Bien qu’il soit trop tôt pour savoir qui aura raison, l’histoire montre que les prévisions des experts sur les nouvelles innovations technologiques sont souvent loin d’être exactes.

Chris Dixon, associé général de la société de capital-risque Andreessen Horowitz, a écrit en 2010 que „la raison pour laquelle les nouvelles grandes choses se faufilent entre les titulaires est que la prochaine grande chose commence toujours par être rejetée comme un jouet“.

L’essai de Dixon vaut la peine d’être lu, et il est aussi pertinent aujourd’hui qu’il l’était il y a dix ans. Sa thèse s’appuie sur la théorie de la „technologie perturbatrice“ de Clay Christensen, l’idée étant que les technologies ont tendance à s’améliorer plus vite que les besoins des utilisateurs n’augmentent.

Selon M. Dixon, les technologies perturbatrices sont souvent d’abord considérées comme des jouets parce qu’elles ne répondent pas aux besoins des utilisateurs au moment de leur lancement. Il existe de nombreux exemples de ce phénomène. Les premiers téléphones ne pouvaient transporter les voix qu’à un ou deux kilomètres à la ronde. Western Union, la principale compagnie de téléphone de l’époque, a renoncé à acquérir le téléphone parce qu’elle ne voyait pas en quoi il pouvait être utile. Ce qu’ils n’ont pas su anticiper, c’est la rapidité avec laquelle la technologie et l’infrastructure téléphoniques s’amélioreraient en raison des effets de réseau. Selon Dixon, „la même chose était vraie pour les sociétés de mainframe qui voyaient le PC (micro-ordinateur), et pour les sociétés de télécommunications modernes qui voyaient Skype“.

De ce point de vue, de nombreuses critiques initiales de Bitcoin peuvent être classées dans une catégorie similaire. Au fur et à mesure que les effets de réseau de Bitcoin augmentent, son adoption s’accélère. Les réseaux sont différents des autres types de technologie – un ensemble d’appareils connectés devient un réseau et les réseaux se développent en fonction de cette courbe exponentielle. La loi de Metcalfe stipule que l’effet d’un réseau de télécommunications est proportionnel au carré du nombre d’utilisateurs connectés du système (n2).

Les opérateurs historiques peuvent être particulièrement aveugles aux nouvelles technologies innovantes s’ils sont financièrement incités à protéger le statu quo.

Il peut falloir du temps à la société pour se rendre compte que ce que nous pensions comprendre du monde et de l’avenir proche était complètement faux. Beaucoup d’érudits célèbres croyaient autrefois que la Terre était plate. Certaines âmes malavisées ne sont toujours pas convaincues. Il doit en être de même aujourd’hui. De nombreux „avis d’experts“ sur des sujets tels que les bitcoins, le réchauffement climatique, l’économie et la manière de réagir à une pandémie mondiale – sont tout simplement faux.

Cependant, il faut parfois des années pour que les nouvelles sciences et recherches révèlent la vérité. Il y a eu de nombreux cas dans l’histoire où il a fallu du temps à la science pour révéler la vérité, et encore plus longtemps à la société pour l’accepter. Même lorsqu’il apparaît que toutes les recherches sont disponibles, ce n’est que beaucoup plus tard que nous voyons à quel point nous en savons peu.

Voici dix exemples d’experts, de commentateurs, de présidents et de représentants de l’industrie qui ont fait une prédiction audacieuse qui était totalement fausse.

1) „Le cheval est là pour rester mais l’automobile n’est qu’une nouveauté – une mode.“ – Président de la Banque d’épargne du Michigan

Stapper-Quote-1

2) „Qui diable veut entendre les acteurs parler ?“ – H. M. Warner, Warner Brothers, 1927

Stapper-Quote-2

3) „Ce „téléphone“ présente trop de défauts pour être sérieusement considéré comme un moyen de communication. – Note interne de la Western Union, 1876

Stapper-Quote-3

4) „Le voyage en train à grande vitesse n’est pas possible car les passagers, incapables de respirer, mourraient d’asphyxie. – Dr Dionysys Larder, écrivain scientifique et universitaire, 1828

Stapper-Quote-4

5) „Les achats à distance, bien qu’ils soient tout à fait réalisables, vont échouer“ – Time Magazine, 1966

Stapper-Quote-5

6) „Les rayons X s’avéreront être un canular“ – Lord Kelvin, président de la Royal Society, 1883.

Stapper – Citation 6

7) “ Je pense qu’il y a un marché mondial pour peut-être cinq ordinateurs.“ – Thomas Watson, président d’IBM, 1943

Stapper-Quote-7

8) „La télévision ne pourra conserver aucun marché qu’elle capte après les six premiers mois. Les gens seront bientôt fatigués de regarder une boîte en contreplaqué tous les soirs“. – Darryl F. Zanuck, directeur de la 20th Century-Fox, 1946

 

Whales buy BTC

The current price for one Bitcoin (BTC) is currently $11,266.56. That’s -0.83% more than 24 hours ago.

If you now want to buy Bitcoin Aussie System you will get about 0.0089 BTC for this.

The total market cap is $208,598,950,080.00 with a circulation of 18,514,875 BTC.

Also take a look at our Telegram channel and talk about the news!
Whales are accumulating at Bitcoin, analysis company Glassnode says

Whales are accumulating, according to Bitcoin analysis company Glassnode. According to the data from on-chain analysis company Glassnode, the big fish in the bitcoin ocean are rapidly accumulating.

Since the crash of March 13, the number of bitcoin addresses with more than 1000 bitcoin has increased significantly. According to the analysts of Glassnode, this is an indication that more and more rich individuals are investing heavily in bitcoin.
Buying 1000 euros of bitcoin without commission? Get started at Bitvavo
These 13 listed companies have Bitcoin on their balance sheets.

In recent months, MicroStrategy has thrilled the Bitcoin world with over $425 million of bitcoin on its balance sheet. On this website you can follow which listed companies have bitcoin on their balance sheet.

After MicroStrategy’s move, everyone began to speculate which company would take the next step. The name of Square of CEO Jack Dorsey was often mentioned. This eventually turned out to be true, because this week the company stepped into bitcoin with $50 million.

Bitcoin network sends out $2.4 billion worth of transactions every day.

Every day, an average of $2.4 billion is sent on the Bitcoin network. According to research by The Block. They examined all transactions from the past quarter three (July, August and September).

The conclusion: there is still considerable growth in the Bitcoin network. This is an increase of 25% in transaction value compared to the previous quarter.

Stay informed

Do you want to stay up to date with the latest bitcoin news? Then follow us on Twitter.

Do you like to learn more about the technology behind bitcoin? Check out the Hup Bitcoin podcast where we dive deeper into the wonderful world of BTC.